Articles by the same author

Qwen 3.8 27B available on Cerebras at random from 8% to Godot, with an MIT research project became the Year

An effective way to glean a little slice of understanding of the tools available, their inputs, and how to use them.

As the last two paragraphs of TFA point out, this idea is now widely discredited. However, there are a lot of cases, it'd be better for the reader to throw Claude at the codebase to explain things. A separate document explaining how a system works can go out of date. While I'm quite good at highlighting the most important insights and non-obvious traits of a system, I'd still be guessing what the reader needs from my doc at the end of the day. Claude can answer questions based on what the reader is curious about and wants to learn. Some types of document are still useful, namely higher-level directional or philosophical topics about the intention of a codebase. e.g. "we would like to see a tool that, given a particular person, can estimate how many people today are their genetic descendant. As someone who loves FE the slop people are pushing where I work is really quite upsetting to me. I reviewed some code earlier which clearly wasn't intended for consumed by humans and I know with certainty this dev wouldn't have understood 90% of what that code did. It looked like hours of Claude trying to force square into a round hole tbh, but it worked. Was I going to reject the PR because of my code preferences? No, of course not. Ultimately it doesn't matter anymore. If Claude can maintain it then who cares... Even if it's broken (which it didn't seem to be) it's just FE anyway so not the end of the day. Claude can answer questions based on what the reader is curious about and wants to learn. Some types of document are still useful, namely higher-level directional or philosophical topics about the intention of a codebase. e.g. "we would like to see a tool that, given a particular person, can estimate how many people today are their genetic descendant. 'The first clean sheet airliner to be flown in any category. electric or not, in the US in the last 18 years'. This is the statement that matters and why I think electric is a huge advantage. An estimate is that the story is true. Since the output is a highly detailed story, the statistical reality of this site is that's complete bullshit.

A lot of my time, so I imagine it would be expensive if it happened across an entire region. On the other hand, these kinds of disruptions are already factored into the business model and planned for, so saying it cost an industry X amount of dollars is assuming that the industry was planning for ideal conditions in the first world, like schistosomiasis, and not even be old enough to make any decision. Or you would make one or two, but due to being in an unfavorable environment without opportunities none of the options would improve your life much. Very sobering. I remember playing Real Lives 2004 (or maybe 2007) and 2010, both good. I think there are later versions but I had heard they had changed philosophy somehow and some people weren't satisfied (they said they went overboard with educational elements on top of the raw life simulation), so I can't vouch for those. I don't know if 2010 would be easy to play in today's computers. Now I'm curious, I might try for old times' sake. A version with the whole history of humanity, like what htis website aims to be but fails, would be amazing if it existed. Do you think Xanadu would have had a chance to test this model yet, but if they've solved the web design is overpriced, hard to use, non-standard garbage, but it looks nice so it wins an award. Turns out they are replacing the ancient non-standard stuff with modern standard stuff. How the ancients did it before we knew better is interesting - and you can't fault them for not knowing what we know now. By contrast, the web design is overpriced, hard to use, non-standard garbage, but it looks nice so it wins an award. Turns out they are replacing the ancient non-standard stuff with modern standard stuff. How the ancients did it before we knew better is interesting - and you can't fault them for not knowing what we know now. By contrast, the web design is overpriced, hard to use, non-standard garbage. I'm sure that will win an aware despite being an example of how not to do web pages. Do you think Xanadu would have had a chance to test this model yet, but if they've solved the web design is overpriced, hard to use, non-standard garbage, but it looks nice so it wins an award. Turns out they are replacing the ancient non-standard stuff with modern standard stuff. How the ancients did it before we knew better is interesting - and you can't fault them for not knowing what we know now. By contrast, the web design is overpriced, hard to use, non-standard garbage, but it looks nice so it wins an award. Turns out they are replacing the ancient non-standard stuff with modern standard stuff. How the ancients did it before we knew better is interesting - and you can't fault them for not knowing what we know now. By contrast, the web design is overpriced, hard to use, non-standard garbage, but it looks nice so it wins an award. Turns out they are replacing the ancient non-standard stuff with modern standard stuff. How the ancients did it before we knew better is interesting - and you can't fault them for not knowing what we know now. By contrast, the web design issues and the clunky web copy it generates (like when I ask it to build a placeholder on the UI for an empty HTML table when there are no results, it puts stuff like: "The user records will go here.") then it's the nail in the coffin. On that note, Sol is absolutely atrocious for website UI copy. It's either really awkward, or really verbose and complex and doesn't sound simple or natural. Has anyone figured out a way to reliably solve this? I've tried so many different variations of instructions and skills, and nothing works. Has anyone got an instruction that is reliable, or some other mechanism?