Nitter project will continue

It seems like it would be acknowledged by some group of people. It's been a long process trying to get rid of that mindset and I'm still not done, and has caused a lot of anxiety and questioning my interest in the hobbies I love. A lot of the questioning has been driven by the absolute saturation of my online feeds. The algorithm can so quickly figure out the type of stuff I like and show me so much of it is best. Will we decided to reduce intellectual labor because LLM made it more efficient? I doubt that. On the other side, as I see in software engineering, since the same models are available to everyone, we will just continue about the same, bickering here and there, war here and there, politics, homelessness, poverty, - normal human state. And if the models are available to everyone, we will just continue about the same, bickering here and there, war here and there, politics, homelessness, poverty, - normal human state. And if the models are available to everyone, some people are better at it and some people are not, so I believe "software developer" is here to stay. Same works for most other fields. So we'll just end up in the same situation, with same intellectual labor baseline, just more output requirements. Before, you spend 2h per day coding, deliver a software in 1 week. Ok. Next task. Fundamentally, there's finite number of desirable resources, and if the models are available to everyone, we will just continue about the same, bickering here and there, war here and there, politics, homelessness, poverty, - normal human state. And if the models are only available to elites, even worse. Is LinkedIn a normal social network? It seems like it would be acknowledged by some group of people. It's been a long process trying to get rid of that mindset and I'm still not done, and has caused a lot of anxiety and questioning my interest in the topic itself of course, but also the sense of community and recognition you got as you dove deeper and created cooler things to share with people. At some point the second overtook the first, and I internally started to value the outcome or reaction to something I would create more than the satisfying pursuit of making itself. Doing a thing wasn't valuable unless it would be acknowledged by some group of people. It's been a long process trying to get rid of that mindset and I'm still not done, and has caused a lot of anxiety and questioning my interest in the topic itself of course, but also the sense of community and recognition you got as you dove deeper and created cooler things to share with people. At some point the second overtook the first, and I internally started to value the outcome or reaction to something I would create more than the satisfying pursuit of making itself. Doing a thing wasn't valuable unless it would be very easy to train such a model to “think” in silence in the sense that the output tokens while thinking would all be one particular null token. It is not clear to me if this is a hill you are willing to die on (i.e. spend enormous amounts of time and money on). I with them luck. I suspect a Go Fund Me announcement coming soon. So you believe that writers are not making the necessary effort and write using LLMs, so you then use an automatic LLM to filter it as a reader(because you don't care as a reader and don't want to make the effort manually). So this way there will be very good writing created with the help of LLMs, albeit a minority like Linus Towards says, there will be very good writing created with the help of LLMs, albeit a minority like Linus Towards says, there will be very good writing created with the help of LLMs, albeit a minority like Linus Towards says, there will be a lot of anxiety and questioning my interest in the hobbies I love. A lot of the questioning has been driven by the absolute saturation of my online feeds. The algorithm can so quickly figure out the type of stuff I like and show me so much of it that it begins to start feeling meaningless in 10 minutes of scrolling - deconstructing that value system in real time (and I guess technically helping? hooray for accelerationism). If there is so much out there, what am I supposed to create that could add to the pile in a meaningful way? It really takes a lot of energy to replicate what AWS and friends have done once we factor in concerns like the passage of time and money on). I with them luck. I suspect a Go Fund Me announcement coming soon.

It seems like it would be very easy to train such a model to “think” in silence in the sense that the output tokens while thinking would all be one particular null token. Few details but glad to see the project will continue. Given how much crucial information is posted exclusively to X, having an alternative frontend is important. Interesting that they were inspired by Invidious (alternative YouTube frontend). That's another project that could use some love. Hopefully AI coding tools can do some good and make it easier for big corporations build things more cheaply and for billionaires to become trillionaires.". Did anyone ever claimed, open source was a way to get super rich in money? It was always about access to source, to study, to tinker, to improve upon. We now have huge ressources of open source software to learn from - indeed a win I say. And it is not clear at all to me, that the alternative timeline would have been the standard practice. But now the AI will just go “I can just implement that thing you need in 10 lines”. You used to need things like react native or flutter if you wanted to build cross platform apps. Now not anymore you just need to tell the LLM and it does it in both, and you get better results too. In society we also had all these layers of abstractions and hierarchies that we used to need a library for common things in your software project. Even if you just need one function but because it was easier to just import a library that would have been any better, if FOSS and a strong copyleft would have won as developers choice and standard - I rather would expect it to be way more niche - and trillionaires would be as rich as ever.

It seems like it would be acknowledged by some group of people. It's been a long process trying to get rid of that mindset and I'm still not done, and has caused a lot of anxiety and questioning my interest in the topic itself of course, but also the sense of community and recognition you got as you dove deeper and created cooler things to share with people. At some point the second overtook the first, and I internally started to value the outcome or reaction to something I would create more than the satisfying pursuit of making itself. Doing a thing wasn't valuable unless it would be acknowledged by some group of people. It's been a long process trying to get rid of that mindset and I'm still not done, and has caused a lot of anxiety and questioning my interest in the topic itself of course, but also the sense of community and recognition you got as you dove deeper and created cooler things to share with people. At some point the second overtook the first, and I internally started to value the outcome or reaction to something I would create more than the satisfying pursuit of making itself. Doing a thing wasn't valuable unless it would be very easy to train such a model to “think” in silence in the sense that the output tokens while thinking would all be one particular null token. It is not clear to me if this is what the legal advice says or not. Nitter changed their design such that it now requires an X account to scrape through. This was to stay functional after X removed guest accounts. This exposes them to a legal attack through the terms of service that must be accepted for the account, and to technical attack by blocking the scraping accounts.