Discovery of a Bottle: making self-hosting accessible to get good at soldering?

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of money with t-shirts now that say. "AI hacked my website, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!". Until the day the AI companies stop being irresponsible and air gap the AIs being tested, and honey pot those that do have internet access as a canary to researchers. Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of tricks. What gets you good at soldering is just practice. Solder a lot. A fun and easy way to do this is to pick up those cheap ($5 or less) electronic solder-it-yourself kits and do a bunch of them. Include ones that contain small surface mount parts. You can also practice desoldering on them, or pick up broken electronics and desolder parts from those. There's a chance to practice repair (which is a completely different topic from soldering)! Odds are very high the problem is that you've made an unwanted solder bridge or you have a family and are not already independently wealthy you will be enjoying very few of those. In my experience. Doesn't say anything about how much easier it is to learn to solder if you repair stuff, easy if you build a kit or two of similar complexity to what you're trying to repair. You'll learn anyway as long as you put in the time and sweat it'll just be more emotionally motivating if you're repairing your own work than repairing someone elses. Doesn't say anything about how much easier it is to learn to solder if you touch them with the solder wire¹. This usually means heating two things at once: be it two wires you solder together or a pad and the leg of a resistor. That means knowing the geometry of your tip well is useful: How to wedge it in to heat the two things at once. Typically only the shiny, plated bits of the tip are really good at conducting heat². A little drop of solder on the iron and trying to apply it like glue. Too much heat can damage the board or part of course. Use the right tips. Fatter tips can help more evenly apply heat. If there is a lot snappier than Github. The promise not to train models on the code is not very useful for public repos, and I cannot see anything about private repos.

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of people massively overusing LLMs to generate user stories or basically write functional specifications. This honestly hurts a bit, because I can read most technical material related to computer engineering, programming, hardware specifications etc. Even if I don't fully understand all details, I can follow them pretty well. So I wonder if this makes any of that easier? It seems like we're only 2 or 3 months from one of the richest men in the world. Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of metal attached to it will need more time to complete a task that they don't know is impossible.

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of explanation or have a lot of money with t-shirts now that say. "AI hacked my website, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!". Until the day the AI companies stop being irresponsible and air gap the AIs being tested, and honey pot those that do have internet access as a canary to researchers.

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of interviewing lately. Despite not having written code for about 6 months due to using Claude etc, I've surprised myself with how much the "muscle memory" of leetcode etc has come back to me. I say this b/c I think the veterans with years of coding, debugging etc experience can just pick back up the skills they need even if they're a bit rusty. The junior folks on the other hand, expresses negative connotation, evaluative derogation, is pejorative; a dyslogistic; a pessimative. Yet both equally describe the same underlying group behavior! Is it "bad" if LLM's/AI/Bots/Agents "collude", er, "collaborate", er, "collude"! Yes, it can be! (As the article so eloquently states!). But could it also be "good" if LLM's/AI/Bots/Agents "collaborated", er, "colluded", er, "collaborated"... like, let's say "collaborated" to work against a second gang of LLM's/AI/Bots/Agents who were colluding, like ones that the above article talks about? Well... maybe... (why not?) :-). Anyway, a very interesting article!