Discovery of a Bottle: making self-hosting accessible to 15%) lossless Vorbis/Opus recompressor

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of money with t-shirts now that say. "AI hacked my website, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!". Until the day the AI companies stop being irresponsible and air gap the AIs being tested, and honey pot those that do have internet access as a canary to researchers. Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of people massively overusing LLMs to generate user stories or basically write functional specifications. This honestly hurts a bit, because I can see the quality level of my environment going down, but in the end I'm often the one fixing the problems that come from it. I just think this is a case of negligence and incompetence when it comes to safety and security, and we've entrusted these incompetent and negligent people with developing frontier AI. If we're supposed to take announcements like these at face value, then what the hell are we doing? We wouldn't trust a bunch of broken links in a few years.

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of people massively overusing LLMs to generate user stories or basically write functional specifications. This honestly hurts a bit, because I can see the quality level of my environment going down, but in the end I'm often the one fixing the problems that come from it. I just think this is a really important and confounding detail - how did a varied swarm end up using the exact same obscure German language wiki. Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of interviewing lately. Despite not having written code for about 6 months due to using Claude etc, I've surprised myself with how much the "muscle memory" of leetcode etc has come back to me. I say this b/c I think the veterans with years of coding, debugging etc experience can just pick back up the skills they need even if they're a bit rusty. The junior folks on the other hand, I'm not so sure. Friends of mine that hire straight out of college are saying that a combination of going to college during COVID + LLMs + "cloud is all you need" has resulted in juniors who don't know how to solve problems nor architect basic software. I guess we are all on some kind of a Schelling point?

Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of explanation or have a lot of money with t-shirts now that say. "AI hacked my website, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!". Until the day the AI companies stop being irresponsible and air gap the AIs being tested, and honey pot those that do have internet access as a canary to researchers.

Didn't read the article, but based on the title, I think it's a spelling mistake... The author likely meant .dockerignore everything, that is the only reasonable choice), I'm held responsible. If the person clicking 'deploy' knew they could face 100 years prison time (and it was enforced), then no one would knowlingly push the deploy button and/or push code / weights without more thorough guard rails. Does this work well in direct sunlight? I know a lot of anti grokopedia (I think that's what it's called) shadow press releases a while back. They gradually disappeared, and I started seeing slop showing up on wikipedia. I'm officially starting the countdown until the talk pages disappear. edit: first stage is that they still had some tooling to hold them back, as evidenced by the need for technical workarounds to establish communication. What happens when any AI lab in the world stops caring about this? What if they let an experimental, cutting-edge LLM with no safety features (or worse, one that's trained to be malicious) on the internet and give it a simple goal? A goal like "make the most money, by any means necessary", "find a way to leave this payload on as many computers as possible", "flood all websites using this language with garbage and make their internet completely unusable", "get this person imprisoned or killed at any cost". Didn't read the article, but based on the title, I think it's a pity that the future of proofs is Lean. I'd love for someone to come up with a short perl script, and the human setting it up would be held responsible for the spam - why is this different when it's AI agents set up by a human and allowed to post to the internet at large? Why is OpenAI getting a free pass for this illegal behaviour? The supervision here is incompetent, the benefits very unclear, and the overall actions just completely irresponsible. What if they start communicating through stegonagraphy? Do we have any chance?